SHELF LIFE: THE CATCHER IN THE RYE
Copyright Little Brown and Company 1991 |
This column focuses upon those books
that have had a role in developing how we think about the world.
In my particular experience they tend to be novels, with
a book of poems or nonfiction work on intellectual history thrown in. But by
and large I have lived my ‘life of the mind’ through Fiction—a misnomer if
there ever were one. What this implies is that I prefer fantasy to reality. Rather,
I find more reality in what are essentially stories, than I do in factual
accounts, because a novel involves a degree of artifice, whereas a newspapers
or history books present facts, but mask their intentions by what they specifically
say. The novel speaks about the world; about the minds of men and women,
children, sometimes animals; about landscape and climate; history and memory;
while at the same time also presenting facts and poetry in the service of
truth.
Each
novel has in turn its own truth, characterized by the author’s choice of
language used to depict characters, find their voices, and carry the plot forward. I
can think of few novels that I read during my youth that carried more emotional
weight than J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher
in the Rye. It is an extremely banal story told by a seventeen-year-old home for the holidays and
waiting to tell his parents that he has been expelled from yet another prep
school. We have him in various experiences meeting up with girls he knows,
getting drunk, and taking cabs everywhere.
Banal
action combined with active reflection is in fact the hallmark of the accepted
literary masterpiece, for even though events may not seem special, it is the
person involved in them who compels us, and how the accrual of emotional
responses they have to such events produces an emotional response that forces them to interact either with the social dynamic inherent
in their surroundings, or the regard for truth in themselves. The process of self-recognition lends even
the most ignorant of souls through a continuum of revelation.
Much of what we need to know of our protagonist is limited by his vocabulary, but even at that level, he tells us about his frame of mind in every phrase. There are facts that he announces about his family despite his initial unwillingness to do so. One assumes these are the facts he cares about. He has an old brother named D.B. who writes terrific short stories but who sold himself out by moving to Hollywood to write screenplays. He had a brother named Allie whom he really loved but who died of Leukemia, and he has a little sister named Phoebe who he’s crazy about.
Much of what we need to know of our protagonist is limited by his vocabulary, but even at that level, he tells us about his frame of mind in every phrase. There are facts that he announces about his family despite his initial unwillingness to do so. One assumes these are the facts he cares about. He has an old brother named D.B. who writes terrific short stories but who sold himself out by moving to Hollywood to write screenplays. He had a brother named Allie whom he really loved but who died of Leukemia, and he has a little sister named Phoebe who he’s crazy about.
Everything
in Holden’s perspective falls under a few basic descriptions, and though his
experiences are vivid, and he feels the repercussions of them even before he is
finished having them, people are either ‘grand’ or ‘phony.’ Holden likes things
that are real, and people who are without pretention. He is unfazed by the
movies or theatre, or any who’s really an authority in what they do because
sooner or later they start taking themselves too seriously and become a
‘phony’. He sees people trying to become more than they are, and he despises
them for it. Likewise, he is appreciative of anyone who is sincere, and likes
to do simple things, and does them well, like playing checkers, dancing the two
step, or whistling. It’s clear that this is the perspective of someone who has
not yet graduated to adult life.
The
world that we see through Holden is mostly the one he has no choice but to
inhabit, and there are few joys for him, as he has barricaded himself away from
the usual distractions. There are girls that he likes, and there is his kid
sister, Phoebe, who ‘knocks me out’. He is always judging someone’s actions,
and he turns every encounter in the novel into good and bad versions of people.
He very much lives inside his own head, and he is always dreaming up film-like
scenarios in which he gets shot and has to stumble around holding his guts in
when he’s really just drunk and lonely and walking in the rain; or he has a
fantasy of running away with a girl he likes, and they both end up living like
deaf mutes, not talking to anyone else and only communicating by writing each
other notes. He only comes to his senses when he realizes that his most recent
fantasy has inspired his sweet little sister to join him in his fantastic
adventures. He knows they’re all folderol, just stories he tells, and because
she loves him so, she believes him. That’s when he decides to go home and admit
to his parents his most recent transgression, and take the consequences, which
result in therapy.
Holden
is in love with innocence, with the sentimental utility of his own
memories, and with certain abstract facts, like where the ducks that live in
the lagoon in Central Park go when it freezes up. He is, if anything, an essentialist,
and is always a measuring stick to guide us through a hall of fame of past ‘phonies’. His perfect
touchstone in all this is his dear little sister Phoebe, and the final scene
has him watchng her riding the carousel in Central Park, trying to catch the
brass ring which, as anyone knows, gives you a free ride.
I
will admit that when I was fifteen years old I had a minor obsession with this
book, so going back and reading it was a bit of a revelation. It was charming
and funny and silly and youthful, and instead of reminding me of lost youth, it
made me realize how much I still have in common with myself when I was
teenager. Holden and I are brothers of the city after all, we both went to
private high schools, had to be adults before our time, and had an idea about
how rebellion could shape us, though we didn’t yet have the sophistication to
manage it.
Emerson said it
best in Self-Reliance: “Society
everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of everyone of its members.” Holden
Caulfield is a man in the making, a boy shaking himself off from his childhood
while still revering the things that make childhood worthwhile and adulthood
suspicious. He’s conscious of the conspiracy against his own manhood, as he
itemizes the ‘grand’ and the ‘phony’ types en route to a place of relative
peace.
Comments